The Musings of Jaime David
The Musings of Jaime David
@jaimedavid.blog@jaimedavid.blog

The writings of some random dude on the internet

1,089 posts
1 follower

Tag: Essay

  • How I Think The Simpsons Will End

    How I Think The Simpsons Will End

    It’s hard to imagine a world without The Simpsons. For decades, this animated yellow family from Springfield has been part of the cultural bloodstream, weaving itself into our collective consciousness. It’s more than just a show — it’s a time capsule of changing eras, a satire of American life, and, somehow, a story that keeps going. But one day, inevitably, it will have to end. And when that happens, I don’t think it’ll be some wild apocalypse, or some weird “it was all a dream” twist. No, I think it’ll be something far more human, far more grounded — and yet, still deeply Simpsons.

    I think the end will come with a decision — a big one — that the Simpsons family is leaving Springfield. That’s the heart of it. That’s the premise that could wrap everything up neatly, emotionally, and thematically. It’s the one thing that could bring closure not just to the family, but to the entire town itself. Because Springfield is almost a character in its own right — its quirks, its people, its chaos, all define the show’s world. So when the Simpsons decide to leave, that would be like the final curtain call.

    And through that departure, we’d get resolutions to all sorts of long-running gags and storylines. The show is legendary for its running jokes — the prank calls, the chalkboard gags, the couch gags, the ever-shifting geography of Springfield, and the bizarre elasticity of time that’s kept Bart ten years old since 1989. But among all these threads, I think two gags in particular would find their perfect ending. Two gags that, oddly enough, both circle around Bart Simpson.

    Because, at its core, The Simpsons began as Bart’s show. Back in the late ‘80s and early ‘90s, it was Bartmania. The rebellious, skateboarding, slingshot-carrying “Underachiever (and proud of it)” kid was the face of the show. Over time, Homer took over as the emotional and comedic center, but Bart’s legacy still lingers. And so, in the final episode, I think it’s only fitting that two of Bart’s most iconic running bits — El Barto and the prank calls to Moe’s Tavern — come to a close.


    The Reveal of El Barto

    For decades, Springfield has been covered in graffiti tagged by a mysterious figure: El Barto. Fans, of course, have always known the truth. El Barto is Bart’s alter ego, the mischievous artist leaving his signature all over town. It’s one of those jokes that never needed explanation, never needed a payoff — it just existed as part of the background. But in an ending, it would make perfect sense to bring it full circle.

    Picture this: the Simpsons are packing up. Boxes everywhere, Lisa’s carrying her saxophone case, Maggie’s holding her pacifier like a souvenir. Marge is frazzled, worried about logistics. Homer’s making sarcastic comments about how he’ll miss Lard Lad Donuts’ “fine cuisine.” And Bart’s sitting there, just kind of quiet. Maybe a little nostalgic, which for Bart is rare. He looks out the window at the Springfield skyline — the power plant, the Kwik-E-Mart, Moe’s, the school, all of it. And that’s when he turns to Homer and says something like, “Hey, Dad. Before we go, there’s something I should tell you.”

    And Homer, half-paying attention, maybe sipping a Duff, just grunts: “What is it, boy?”

    And Bart replies, “I’m El Barto.”

    Now, the beauty of that moment would be in how simple it is. For the audience, it’s not a revelation — we already know. But for Homer, maybe he never connected the dots. Maybe he just blinks, puts down his beer, and laughs, thinking Bart’s joking. Then, he realizes Bart’s serious. And there’s this flicker of pride in his eyes. Maybe even admiration. Because deep down, Homer might recognize that El Barto was more than mischief — it was Bart’s way of leaving his mark on the world. His way of saying, “I was here.”

    And maybe Homer, for once, doesn’t scold him. Maybe he says something like, “Well, you did a good job, boy. I see that tag everywhere.” And Bart smirks, like he always does, and says, “Thanks, man.” That would be such a simple, powerful way to acknowledge their relationship — built on mischief, misunderstanding, and underneath it all, love.

    Because The Simpsons, at its best, is about family. It’s about the way they mess up, fight, and still love each other despite everything. And that moment — Bart admitting who he is, Homer accepting it — could encapsulate that perfectly.


    The Last Prank Call

    Now, the second gag that deserves a conclusion — maybe even more than El Barto — is the legendary prank calls to Moe’s Tavern. These are some of the oldest jokes in The Simpsons history. Bart calls Moe’s, asks for some ridiculous fake name — “I.P. Freely,” “Amanda Huggenkiss,” “Al Coholic” — and Moe, ever the gullible barkeep, shouts it across the bar, only to realize he’s been had. It’s slapstick, it’s juvenile, and yet it’s so essential to Bart’s character.

    So how do you end that? You end it by doing it one last time — but differently.

    Imagine this: it’s near the end of the episode. The Simpsons’ house is half-empty now. Boxes stacked up, the walls bare. Bart looks at his old prank call list — maybe a notebook filled with scribbled names. He smiles, grabs the phone, and dials Moe’s one more time.

    Moe answers, in that gruff, tired voice: “Moe’s Tavern, where the elite meet to drink. Moe speaking.”

    Bart smirks. “Uh, yeah, is there a Hugh… Hugh Jass there?”

    Moe, as always, takes the bait. “Hey, everyone! I’m lookin’ for a Hugh Jass!” And, as usual, silence follows. Then someone in the background goes, “I’m Hugh Jass.” And Moe mutters, “Oh. Uh, sorry.” Then there’s that familiar beat of realization, that sigh of defeat.

    But this time, Bart doesn’t hang up.

    He hesitates. Maybe for a moment, you can even hear the emotion in his voice. And he says, “Hey, Moe… it’s me. It’s Bart. Bart Simpson.”

    There’d be silence on the other end. You could almost hear the bar quiet down.

    And Moe, confused, says, “Wait… you mean you’re the little punk who’s been prank calling me all these years?”

    Bart chuckles softly. “Yeah. That was me.”

    And Moe, in that half-resentful, half-sentimental way only Moe can manage, would probably go off. “You little son of a—! Do you have any idea how many times I fell for that? How many times I looked like an idiot?!”

    Bart, being Bart, might just say, “Every single time.”

    And then, in a rare moment of vulnerability, Moe’s tone changes. Maybe he sighs. “Y’know, kid… I ain’t gonna lie. Those calls… as much as they drove me nuts… I’m gonna miss ‘em.”

    And Bart says, “Yeah… me too.”

    Then Moe might add, “Don’t tell anyone I said this, but… you made the bar a little less miserable.”

    And Bart smiles, maybe says, “Thanks, Moe.” Then hangs up.

    It’s small. It’s simple. But it would be the perfect emotional punctuation to years of laughter. Because, really, those prank calls were about connection. Bart and Moe — total opposites, from different worlds — unknowingly shared a weird, comedic bond. And by ending that gag with honesty, the show would not only close a running joke, but highlight one of the most human things about The Simpsons: even absurd relationships can have meaning.


    The Farewell to Springfield

    From there, I imagine the episode winding down. The family says their goodbyes — Marge to her friends at the church, Lisa to her teachers and classmates, Homer to the power plant (and probably to Lenny and Carl in some hilariously heartfelt exchange), and Maggie, silent as ever, maybe gives a wave to the sandbox at the daycare.

    And as they drive out of town, maybe we see the residents of Springfield lined up — Moe, Apu, Principal Skinner, Krusty, Comic Book Guy, Ned Flanders, all waving goodbye. Each of them representing a piece of the show’s legacy.

    Then, perhaps as they cross the city limits, Bart looks out the back window and sees a wall — a blank one — and he sprays one last “El Barto” tag on it. His final mark. The car drives away, and the camera lingers on the graffiti. That’s the last image.

    “El Barto Was Here.”


    Why It Fits

    Ending The Simpsons this way makes sense, because it honors both its chaos and its heart. It’s funny, nostalgic, and quietly emotional without betraying the show’s tone. It doesn’t try to shock. It doesn’t go for a huge meta ending. It just lets the characters say goodbye in their own way.

    And the El Barto reveal and Moe’s Tavern confession — those are perfect encapsulations of Bart’s character growth. He’s still mischievous, still funny, but finally old enough (emotionally, at least) to own up to his actions. It’s closure for him — and, symbolically, for the whole show.

    Because in the end, The Simpsons has always been about time standing still. The characters don’t age, the town never changes too much, and everything resets at the start of the next episode. But in an ending, you’d want to finally break that cycle — not by killing anyone off, not by jumping ahead in time, but simply by having them move on.

    Springfield, as absurd and wonderful as it is, was always a metaphor for America itself — this flawed, chaotic, colorful place that’s equal parts hilarious and heartbreaking. And when the Simpsons leave, it’s like saying goodbye to a reflection of ourselves.


    Final Thoughts

    So yeah, that’s how I think The Simpsons will end — not with a bang, but with a heartfelt goodbye. A farewell that ties together humor, nostalgia, and emotion in a way only The Simpsons could.

    Bart finally admitting he’s El Barto. Bart finally telling Moe the truth. And then the family finally driving off into the sunset, leaving behind the town that shaped them — and that they, in turn, helped define.

    It’s the kind of ending that feels inevitable. Simple. Poetic. The perfect way to close one of the most enduring stories in television history.

    Because when you think about it, the Simpsons never really belonged to Springfield — Springfield belonged to them.

    And maybe that’s the real punchline.

    Fediverse Reactions
  • The Cat in the Hat Is the Villain, and It’s Time We Admit It

    The Cat in the Hat Is the Villain, and It’s Time We Admit It

    For decades, The Cat in the Hat has been celebrated as a whimsical children’s classic, a cornerstone of early literacy, and a testament to Dr. Seuss’s imagination. But beneath the rhymes and colorful chaos lies a troubling narrative that has somehow evaded proper scrutiny. Let’s be honest—the Cat in the Hat isn’t some harmless trickster. He’s an uninvited intruder with no respect for boundaries, safety, or the psychological well-being of children. In any other context, this would be a cautionary tale about home invasion, manipulation, and gaslighting.

    Consider the setup: two children are left home alone on a rainy day. Already, the vulnerability is palpable. Enter a six-foot-tall anthropomorphic cat wearing a striped hat who just walks in. No knocking, no consent, just immediate occupation of the space. He doesn’t introduce himself with any sort of accountability. Instead, he performs a bizarre show-and-tell of danger, balancing on balls and juggling household objects with zero regard for safety. The family fish—acting as the sole voice of reason—is immediately dismissed and treated like a buzzkill for daring to raise concerns about liability and injury.

    And then the Cat brings in Thing 1 and Thing 2, two feral agents of chaos who proceed to wreak havoc on the house. Their behavior borders on malicious. They tear through the place like toddlers on a sugar high in a demolition derby. This isn’t entertainment—it’s an escalation. At no point do the children have any real control over the situation. They are essentially hostages in their own home, guilt-tripped into either compliance or silence. The psychological pressure is off the charts. And after all the destruction, the Cat conveniently summons a clean-up contraption, erasing the physical evidence like a criminal wiping down a crime scene. “No harm done,” he implies, as if trauma isn’t a factor.

    This narrative teaches children all the wrong lessons. That charismatic intruders can be fun. That protest is futile. That covering up damage is better than taking responsibility. That chaos is acceptable as long as it’s cleaned up before the adults get home. And above all, that consequences are optional if you smile wide enough. The Cat doesn’t apologize. He doesn’t learn. He simply leaves, free to pull the same stunt on another unsuspecting household. He is, in essence, a serial boundary violator who wraps his anarchy in a bow of rhymes and slapstick.

    It’s time we retire this character as a lovable icon and recognize him for what he is—a cautionary symbol of unchecked ego disguised as fun. Maybe it’s satire, maybe it’s a subtle warning, or maybe it’s just another example of how we excuse harmful behavior when it’s packaged with enough flair. Either way, the Cat in the Hat is not your friend. He’s the villain of the story. And frankly, someone should’ve called animal control.

  • One Piece: The Modern-Day Odyssey

    One Piece: The Modern-Day Odyssey

    Introduction

    So, I don’t know if I’m the only one who thinks this, but One Piece is a modern-day Odyssey. Nani (for those of you who don’t know, “nani” is the Japanese word for “what”)???? Yes, you heard it right! The anime/manga series “One Piece” is a modern-day version of “The Odyssey!” You know; that epic from ancient Greece that you learn about in high school and whatnot (at least, I assume people learn about it in high school. I don’t know what the curriculum is like in other high schools. I went to a private school, and I know that I learned about “The Odyssey” in my school)? The one that’s written by a guy named Homer who’s last name is not Simpson (and who, as far as I’m aware, doesn’t even have a last name, because it was written during a period of time when last names weren’t a thing, or at the very least, weren’t very common)? Yes; that “Odyssey!” How so? Well, One Piece has a lot of similar themes, and a similar story structure, to The Odyssey! Let me show you what I mean! Now, before I begin, I’m going to point out that there are A LOT of themes in both The Odyssey and One Piece that I could make numerous blog posts about and whatnot, but I’ll save those for another time! For now, I just want to highlight some major themes and story structures that are similar in both works. Oh, and spoiler alert for those who haven’t read the Odyssey nor read/watched One Piece! With that out of the way, let’s begin!

    Synopses

    As with all comparative essays, one must start with synopses of the works that are being compared. I will do the same for this blog post!

    The Odyssey:

    “The Odyssey” focuses on Odysseus’ 10-year journey home to Ithaca after the Trojan War. Along the way, he sails the sea, explores different islands, faces many powerful enemies (such as gods and monsters), and meets many different people!

    One Piece:

    “One Piece” is about a boy named Luffy who sets off to sea at 17 to find the elusive treasure named “The One Piece.” Along the way, he gets together a crew, explores different islands, faces many powerful enemies (some with superhuman abilities, thanks to these fruits called “Devil Fruits,” and some without), and makes many new friends!

    Similarities

    Now that I’ve summarized the premises of “One Piece” and “The Odyssey,” I will now present to you the various similarities in both works!

    Epic-style storytelling:

    Right off the bat, one should note that both works have an epic-style storytelling. What is an epic? According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, an epic is defined as “a long narrative poem in elevated style recounting the deeds of a legendary or historical hero” (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/epic). Now, obviously “The Odyssey” fits this definition exactly. It was a long poem, written during ancient Greece, that narrates the journey of Odysseus as he makes his way home to Greece. Along the way, he accomplishes many feats that seem “legendary” and “heroic.” Odysseus embarks on the hero’s journey, and we see him grow and evolve as the narrative goes on. “The Odyssey” definitely fits the definition of what constitutes an epic. Does “One Piece” fit the definition, as well? I would say yes.

    How does “One Piece” fit the definition of what it means to be an epic? Of course, it isn’t a poem. It is an anime/manga series! However, it is focused mainly on the journey of a central character (Luffy) as he travels the world in search of the mysterious “One Piece” and become Pirate King! Throughout the series, Luffy and his crew are seen accomplishing many feats that other characters thought were impossible to achieve! We (the audience) see Luffy and his crew grow and develop throughout the course of the series! Sure, “One Piece” may not be the standard form of an epic tale, however, it is still an epic tale, in my opinion! Luffy embarks on the hero’s journey at the very start of the series, and from there, we witness Luffy’s quest to reach “The One Piece!” Similarly, in “The Odyssey,” we (the audience) witness Odysseus’s quest to get back home!

    Importance of the sea:

    The sea plays a pivotal role in both “The Odyssey” and “One Piece.” In both works, the sea is used as a mode of transport to get from one destination to another. The characters use sea-faring ships to traverse the sea and go from island to island.

    The sea is also a means of escape for the characters in both works. Odysseus uses the sea to escape Calypso’s island, and the Straw Hats use the sea to escape many perilous situations, such as escaping from Enies Lobby after their battle with CP9. The sea also evokes a sense of uncertainty and danger in both “The Odyssey” and “One Piece.” In “The Odyssey,” once Odysseus sets out to see after escaping the island of Calypso, he doesn’t know what lies ahead of him. All he does know is that for him to reach Greece, he has to traverse straight through the uncertainty that lies ahead. In “One Piece,” the end goal of the Straw Hats from the very beginning of the series is to reach Raftel and find the One Piece. To get there, they have to travel along the Grand Line, which has it’s own perils and dangers that many pirates may not expect.

     The sea is also used as a means to world-build and character-build. Many interesting characters are met on the sea, many unique places are discovered while traveling on the sea, and many pivotal moments for the characters in both works take place on the sea!

    Significance of the number “10”:

    The number “10” is prevalent throughout both works. In “The Odyssey,” the number “10” is used to denote how many years have passed since the end of the Trojan War. The Trojan War itself had lasted for 10 years, which parallels how long it’s been since Odysseus has not returned home.

    In “One Piece,” the number “10” is the number of crew members Luffy wants to gather before the end of the series (so far, he has nine, which leads fans to speculate who is, or will be, the 10th member of the Straw Hats). The number “10” is also the number of members are on Blackbeard’s crew (excluding Blackbeard himself, and excluding Doc Q’s horse). The 10 crew members on Blackbeard’s crew are nicknamed “The Ten Titanic Captains,” for they are captains of smaller divisions of the Blackbeard crew. Blackbeard and his crew are foreshadowed to be the antitheses for Luffy and his crew, for the are the opposite in almost every single way in terms of personality, but similar in every single way in terms of their capabilities and roles on their respective crews. The number “10” is also the number of years it was between Luffy meeting Shanks for the first time and receiving the Straw Hat at 7 years old to Luffy setting out to sea and beginning his adventure at 17. The number “10” is also the number of years it was between Shanks lost his arm to save Luffy from drowning and getting eaten from the giant Sea King and Luffy defeating the Sea King with one punch, which was a pivotal moment for Luffy and his character. When Luffy was 7, he was weak. He had just eaten the Gum-Gum fruit and received his rubber abilities, so he was not used to his powers and weaknesses (such as losing the ability to swim for the rest of his life). Because Luffy was weak, he could not defend himself from the bandits that kidnapped him, he could not swim to safety, and he could not fight against the Sea King that tried to eat him. Thus, he relied on Shanks, his hero, to save Luffy during those critical moments in his life. At the end of all of that, when Shanks and his crew were about to leave Foosha Village, Luffy tells Shanks that he wants to be just like him when he grows up, and that he’ll gather his own crew and become a pirate just like him. As a symbol of their bond, Luffy’s dreams, and the promise that Luffy makes to Shanks, Shanks gives Luffy the straw hat he was wearing, and tells Luffy to give it back to him when they meet again! Ten-years was also how old Luffy’s brother Sabo had set out to sea and “died.” It was after Sabo’s “death” that Luffy and his brother Ace made a promise to always protect each other, that they’d set out to sea at 17, and that no matter what crew they were on, they’d always be brothers at heart!

     As you all can see, the number “10” is a significant number in both works! There are probably even more examples I could list about the significance of the number “10,” but I won’t because I don’t want to sound like a bore. However, it is something interesting to think about!

    Larger-than-life villains:

     Both works are filled TO THE BRIM with larger-than-life villains, both literally and figuratively! In “The Odyssey,” Odysseus fights against gods, giants, monsters, and creatures. In “One Piece,” Luffy and crew face off against giants, creatures, really big enemies that aren’t considered giants, and characters that are very powerful. In both works, these enemies are represented as larger-than-life, either physically (i.e. size) or figuratively (i.e. power). Significant size differences can make someone seem small. Luffy’s and Odysseus’s sizes are closest to the sizes of a real human, and seeing them face off against gigantic enemies can create a feeling of tension, and it can be very cathartic to see them overcome the enemies that are larger than them.

    Obstacles:

    In both works, there are TONS of obstacles throughout the worlds! In “The Odyssey,” Odysseus face monsters, giants, gods, and creatures, prevails through storms, whirlpools, and wreckage, treks through different islands, and deals with the wrath of numerous gods in order to get back home.

     In One Piece, Luffy and crew come across various obstacles while traveling the seas, from pirate crews attacking them to Marines ambushing them. They also need to brave through storms, fight past sea monsters, and find their way past rocks, cliffs, and mountains that get in their way.

    Theme of freedom:

    Both works have a running theme of freedom. Odysseus and Luffy both long freedom. For Odysseus, he longs to be free of the curse that the gods put on him so he can get back home. When he is trapped on numerous islands, he wants to be free from his prison so he can get back home. Once Odysseus is home, he defeats all of the suitors so he can be free to be with his wife in private and live the rest of his life in peace and tranquility.

    In One Piece, Luffy and crew desire freedom in their own way. They all want to be free to roam the seas without any Marines or pirates attacking them, and they want to be able to freely accomplish the dreams and goals that they have. When Luffy and crew are trapped by enemies, they long to return to the sea, because for them, the sea represents freedom. It is at the sea that they are truly free. On the sea, they can sail away to anywhere. When Luffy sees other people getting hurt, he wants to do everything that he can so that they can be free of the pain and suffering that they are enduring.

    Theme of rebellion:

    There is a lot of rebellion in both works. In “The Odyssey,” Odysseus rebels against the will of the gods. The gods want him to die, but Odysseus defies what they want. When he returns to Ithaca, he finds that suitors want his wife. Odysseus defies what the suitors want by slaying all of them.

    In One Piece, Luffy and crew rebel against antagonistic forces on numerous occasions. When they face Crocodile on Alabasta, they rebel against him and his entire organization in order to save the people living in the kingdom. When they face Doflamingo on Dressrosa, they rebel against him and his crew, and create an uprising of pirates, Marines, citizens, and enslaved denizens so that they can save the island from the evil tyrant. There are so many more examples that I can list, but I won’t. I only listed notable examples from the series.

    Theme of loyalty:

    In both works, loyalty is a major theme. Both Odysseus and Luffy care about their respective crews and families. Odysseus cares about his crew and his wife a lot. He does all he can to try to bring his crew home, and he does all he can to try to get back to Ithaca to see his wife.

    In One Piece, Luffy cares a lot about his crew, his friends, his brothers, his grandpa, anyone he meets along his journey whom he finds really nice, and anyone who is in suffering or is in pain. He does all he can to help people in need, and will go at great lengths for people he cares about, regardless of how long he’s known them. He’s even willing to go so far as to sacrifice himself for his crew. Luffy’s crew is also very loyal to him and one another. Whenever they are faced with difficult situations, they are willing to put themselves on the front line in order to save each other.

    Theme of resilience:

    The main protagonists in both works are very resilient. Odysseus faces so many foes, obstacles, and hardships to get back home, and even when he’s home, he faces so many enemies to get to his wife. For many, witnessing one’s own crew perish right in front of their own eyes would cause them to break, but not Odysseus. Instead, he stands tall and braves through it all. He braves through every obstacle that the gods throw at him so he can make it back home, even if he winds up returning home alone. It is his resilience, willpower, and bravery that allows him to get back home.

    In One Piece, Luffy and crew are very resilient. No matter how tough the enemies may be, they use all of their strength, skills, and wit in order to defeat them. Even if they are almost on the verge of defeat, they manage to pull through and come out victorious.

    Differences

    Some vs none:

     In “The Odyssey,” Odysseus starts out with a crew. Towards the end, he loses his crew, as well as all of the people that helped him get back home. In “One Piece,” Luffy starts his journey by himself. Over the course of the series, he gathered a crew and made allies along the way. Luffy’s journey is the reverse of Odysseus’s in terms of how it starts out. Luffy starts out with no one and eventually ends up with a crew and allies, while Odysseus starts out with a crew and allies, but ends up coming back home without them.

    Individualism vs collectivism:

     In both works, there are many examples of Odysseus and Luffy holding their own, as well as many examples of them relying on others. When comparing the two characters, however, Odysseus tends to rely on his crew and others a lot, while Luffy relies on himself most of the time. There are some cases, however, where Odysseus is forced to rely on himself (i.e. when his crew members perish in front of his eyes). As for Luffy, there are cases where he needs to rely on his crew (i.e. when there is an enemy that is too strong for any of them to handle individually).

    Brains vs brawn:

     When it comes to Luffy and Odysseus, there is a stark contrast when it comes to how they deal with enemies. For Odysseus, he is strategic. He plans his every move, and relies on his brains and wit in order to overcome difficult situations. For Luffy, on the other hand, he relies on strength and emotion. He uses his brawn to fight his way through most of his problems. This mentality has gotten Luffy and his crew into trouble on more than one occasion.

    Maturity vs immaturity:

    To build upon the previous point, relying on brains can be seen as an example of maturity, while relying on strength can be seen as an example of immaturity. When challenges arise in life, one needs to be logical and strategic. Relying on pure emotion gets one nowhere, because it clouds one’s judgment and prevents them from seeing other perspectives, outcomes, and solutions. This is especially true in survival situations. In order to have the best chances of success and making it out alive, one needs to be logical and strategic, for one mistake or mishap could prove fatal.

     During the Punk Hazard arc, there is one scene where Zoro scolds Luffy for being too reckless, and that he needs to take things more seriously, otherwise he’d put him and the rest of the crew in serious danger.

    Conclusion

    So, as you can see, there are a lot of interesting similarities and parallels between “The Odyssey” and “One Piece.” There is a lot more comparisons and contrasts I could probably make, but I think I’ve said enough for now. If you want, check out this blog post from another One Piece fan who had also found interesting similarities between “One Piece” and “The Odyssey.” Give it a read!

    https://omisyth.wordpress.com/2009/01/03/one-piece-a-modern-day-epic-in-every-sense-of-the-word/

  • Thematic Discussion of Daniela Elana’s “Volatile”

    Thematic Discussion of Daniela Elana’s “Volatile”

    This post is going to be something different. I’ve had the idea in my mind for a while. I’d like to discuss some the themes and symbols in my friend Daniela Elana’s book “Volatile,” and share my thoughts. Hope you enjoy. Oh and spoiler alert, if you have not read the book “Volatile,” there will be plot spoilers in this post, so be forewarned! Without further ado, let’s begin.

    Theme of Betrayal

    Betrayal is a pertinent theme that appears throughout Volatile. Maricel first gets betrayed by the guy she meets on the bus who turned out to be a creep. Later on, she feels betrayed by celebrities that she idolized and looked up to when one of them assaults her and later insults her. Later on in the novel, Maricel gets betrayed by her deadbeat dad who comes into her life out of the blue. The two start to develop a connection, until it was later revealed to Maricel that her dad only wanted to connect for her money. She felt betrayed by that. Towards the climax of the novel, Marciel gets betrayed by her lover Claudius, who was revealed to have lied about everything regarding who he was, including his name. Maricel is forced to work together with a few of the enslaved denizens in the secret society of Lemuria, only to be betrayed yet again by one of the allies that she had previously worked with once all of them were out of the fray. Betrayal is a prevalent theme in Volatile, and the lessons that can be learned can be applied to the real world. Sometimes, you don’t know who you can trust, because people whom you could know really well could have the worst of intentions. The only person you can trust is yourself, but even then, not fully, which was the case when Maricel took possession of the crystal skull. She had lost control of herself and became someone she was not; something she was not. Similarly, strong emotions, whether they are positive or negative, can make us act in ways that we wouldn’t normally act. Same thing with substances. We have the potential to act in ways we wouldn’t normally act. If one is not careful, it is possible to lose one’s self. It is possible to act irrational and become someone you’re not. It is possible to do things you would normally not do. In short, you have to be skeptical of people, and try not to act in ways that can hurt yourself or others. Don’t be too skeptical, though. By acting too skeptical of things, it is possible to turn away the people who care about the most, causing them to feel betrayed. This was the case when Maricel pushed her friends and family away after they warned her about who Claudius really was. By the time she found out for herself who he really was, it was too late. So, to summarize, be skeptical, but not too skeptical, be cautious, but not too cautious, be open to listen to people’s concerns, even if you may not believe it 100 percent, try to act in ways that don’t hurt yourself or others, and lastly, try not to push people away, because you might wind up pushing away the people who care about you the most.

    Theme of Change

    Throughout the novel, Maricel evolves as a character. She starts out as a country gal that no one really knew. As time goes on, she becomes a famous actress who everybody knows. By the end of the novel, she loses all of that fame and becomes a nobody once again. Not only that, but her character also changes in the way she acts. At the start of the novel, she’s passive about a lot of things. By the end of the novel, she becomes a strong and independent character who doesn’t take crap from anyone else. In a way, she goes from being a follower to becoming a leader.

    Similarly, her relationship with Claudius changes. In the beginning, he starts off as an elusive character with a mysterious backstory. As Maricel finds out more about Claudius, their relationship changes. It goes from joyful to annoying to abusive to a full-blown nightmare. In the end, she is able to escape him, but at the cost of losing everything and everyone she loved.

    Individualism vs Conformity

    Throughout the novel, the themes of individuality and conformity clash in dynamic and ironic ways. Maricel’s character is the embodiment of individuality. She constantly makes her own choices, which a lot of the time go against what others expect of her. When her friends and family warned her of Claudius, she decided to stay with him despite what they said to her. When she was brought to Lemuria, she was expected to act like a queen, but she didn’t. She did what she wanted to do. Eventually, she turned on the order itself and found a way to escape. She had help, but ultimately, she made it out alone. From the beginning of the novel all the way to the end, Maricel did things her way.

    Claudius embodies both conformity and individuality. He was imprisoned by God, but eventually made his way out. Once he did, he and a group of other angels turned on God and formed their own society. In this sense, they were individualists because they did things their own way. They didn’t go along with what God and the other angels expected of them. That is how Claudius embodies individuality. On the flipside, he also embodies conformity. Sometime after forming a secret society, Claudius became a tyrant and ruled over the society with an iron fist. He oppressed the citizens of Lemuria and forced them to conform with his vision. If they didn’t, there’d be dire consequences for them.

    Symbolism of Fire

    Fire is a major symbol for “Volatile,” and the rest of the “Through the Fire” series. The relationship of Claudius and Maricel is described as “volatile.” In chemistry, volatility relates to vapor pressures and boiling points for liquids or solids. If the vapor pressure is high, volatility is high. If the boiling point, volatility is low. This is because gases are the most unstable form of matter. Usually, a substance’s volatility is recorded at room temperature. If a substance evaporates (for liquids) or sublimates (for solids) at room temperature, that means that for that specific substance, room temperature was a very high temperature for it. In layman’s terms, room temperature is considered “hot” for volatile substances that evaporate or sublimate at room temperature.

    Fire itself burns at high temperatures. It is a very destructive force. It can end lives, burn homes, and destroy ecosystems. If fire is not contained and controlled, it can quickly go out of control and burn everything in its path.

    Love is usually compared to fire or flames. This is because love, just like fire, can burn uncontrollably if it is not contained or controlled. Similarly, other emotions, especially anger, are like fire as well. If they are not controlled or contained, they can go out of control like a wildfire.

    Fire, for the most part, is bad. It is bad if it goes out of control. However, there are some good qualities about fire. Firstly, fire can be a light source. It can light up the darkness that surrounds. A person with a strong, positive personality can have a similar effect, as well. If there is sadness and negativity in a person’s life, a positive person could sometimes brighten up that person’s life, even if it is in a small or brief way. Positive people can also find a way to bring joy into the lives of those they meet, whether it’s friends, family, lovers, or even strangers. Just by being who they are as people, they are able to make people’s lives better.

    Fire can also provide warmth for people. In the frigid, cold months, or in environments with extreme cold, fire can help provide some warmth for people. Heat is able to radiate out of the flames and can warm a person’s external and internal body temperature. Similarly, someone who is a loving individual can give people feelings of warmth and comfort in the ways they speak and act. They can show uplifting emotional support when needed, and are caring and affectionate individuals.

    Lastly, fire has a rejuvenating effect. Once it destroys an ecosystem, it has the potential to allow new ecosystems to thrive. It provides new organisms with homes and shelter, it allows plants and seedlings to grow and thrive, and it enriches the soil by providing it with nutrients! Similarly, when love fails, it makes way for something new. It allows people to find out who they truly are, and it allows people to better themselves as individuals, and it gives them a chance to find a way to tame the flame that they have within them. It allows one to grow, learn, and thrive! It allows one to enrich their lives with whatever it is they enjoy the most and it allows people to figure out what it is they want from love. It allows people to figure out what they want and how they want to be. The ending of love is not an ending; it’s a beginning. It’s the beginning of something new; something better. It’s the beginning of something that is better than anything that came before! That is what love is, and that is how love can make us grow, even when it ends! Sure, love may be volatile, but it’s volatility can bring about change that is needed for people to grow!

    Closing Thoughts

    There are many more themes and symbols in “Volatile” that I could discuss, but for now, I think I’ve written enough. I don’t want this post to get too long, after all! I just wanted to highlight some themes and symbols that I found interesting! I hope you all enjoyed! While you’re at it, feel free to check out my friend Daniela Elana’s blog. It has a lot of great work on there! Take care, everyone! I plan on making more literary discussions like this, not only of my friend’s other books, but also other works that I find interesting, as well, whether it’s movies, TV shows, video games, books from other authors, YouTube videos, music, art, poems, short stories, etc. Anyways, that’s all for now!

    https://danielaelana.wordpress.com/